Extremism, the childhood disease of comparing opinions

In today's world, characterized by the rapidity of communication and the spread of social media, public debate has undergone a significant evolution. However, alongside this progress, a worrying trend has also emerged: the extremization of opinions. This phenomenon occurs when individuals or groups refuse to question their own positions and abandon themselves to a total denial of the other. But why does this trend occur and what consequences does it bring? In this article, we will explore the concept of extremization in the context of the confrontation of ideas, analyzing the roots of this behavior and suggesting ways to address it.

The Roots of Extremization

The extremization of opinions is not a new phenomenon; it can be seen as a reflection of human emotions and the collective psyche. In many confrontational situations, the need to feel part of a group or to defend a cause can lead to an oversimplification of the issues being debated. When we focus on what divides us rather than what unites us, we are more likely to fall into the trap of polarization.

This behavior often arises from the lack of a real critical discussion. It is easier to attack a straw man, a position that does not accurately express the opinion of others, rather than addressing solid and well-formulated arguments. The idea of ​​refutation is therefore reduced to a series of statements, where the truth is sacrificed on the altar of ego and belonging.

The Role of Denial and the Fear of Confrontation

In a context of exchange of ideas, denial plays a crucial role in extremism. Confronting a different view can be frightening, as it implies the possibility of questioning one's own beliefs. This fear pushes people to defend their ideas in an almost fanatical way, refusing any form of compromise or dialogue.

The difficulty of discussing calmly often emerges in public debates, where interlocutors attack each other rather than confront each other. Every contrary opinion is perceived as a threat, and consequently a climate of tension and hostility is created. This dynamic not only hinders mutual understanding, but also impoverishes the social fabric, eroding the ability to develop a cohesive community open to dialogue.

Building a Healthy and Constructive Confrontation

To counter extremism, it is essential to promote a constructive approach to debate and the exchange of ideas. This involves the willingness to actively listen to the other and to consider different perspectives without falling into the trap of denial. Some practical suggestions include:

1. **Practice active listening**: Listening attentively, without interrupting, allows you to fully understand the other's opinion, thus encouraging a deeper confrontation.

2. **Avoid straw men**: It is essential not to reduce the other's opinion to a caricature or simplification. Correctly representing the positions of others stimulates a healthier debate.

3. **Promote critical thinking**: Encouraging yourself and others to analyze and question your own beliefs, without fear of arriving at different conclusions, can contribute to greater open-mindedness.

4. **Value mutual respect**: A constructive debate is based on respect, even when opinions differ. Creating a safe space for the expression of different ideas helps reduce tension.

5. **Be willing to change your mind**: Mental flexibility and the willingness to modify your beliefs based on new evidence are essential for personal and collective growth.

Conclusion: Towards a Culture of Confrontation

In conclusion, the extremism of opinions is a childhood disease of the confrontation of ideas that can be cured through open and respectful dialogue. By embracing a critical and open approach to different opinions, we can help build a more inclusive and tolerant society. The future of public debate depends on our ability to accept intellectual challenges and to confront each other with honesty and respect, renouncing extremism in favor of a true exchange of ideas. With a collective commitment, we can transform confrontation into an opportunity for growth and mutual understanding.