Who cries fucks who smiles

Why the executioners must be taken away from the hands of the relatives of the victims: a reflection on blood feud, justice and law

08/12/2024 15:26

The concept of justice has always played a crucial role in the fabric of human society. In situations of violent crime, such as murder or acts of personal violence, the natural instinct of the victims' relatives often translates into a desire for revenge. However, it is essential to argue why the perpetrators should be removed from the hands of the victims' relatives, to avoid the cycle of feuding and to ensure that the principle of justice is based on ethical and legal norms.

The temptation to take justice into one's own hands is an understandable phenomenon. The dull and excruciating pain caused by the loss of a loved one can push family members to seek immediate compensation through personal action. However, this approach is not only ineffective in bringing true peace or healing, but often exacerbates social tensions and perpetuates a cycle of violence. History teaches us that feuds between families or groups can last for generations, causing further suffering and an increase in the number of innocent victims. Therefore, removing the perpetrator from the wrath of the relatives is a necessary step to break this destructive cycle.

A central aspect of the discussion on justice is the distinction between law and revenge. Legal justice, when properly applied, aims to restore the individual to his or her place in the community through a fair trial. This requires an objective assessment of evidence, the application of existing laws, and consideration of the rights of all parties involved – not only the victim, but also the alleged perpetrator. If the families of victims were free to inflict punishment, the fundamental principle of the presumption of innocence and the right to a fair trial, which are cornerstones of any democratic society, would be undermined.

Furthermore, the human element of justice means that personal revenge rarely leads to true satisfaction. Once the act of revenge has been carried out, the emptiness and pain remain, without truly filling the gap left by the loss. In contrast, a judicial process, despite its burden of pain, offers an opportunity to process the tragedy in a controlled and professional context, where the facts are examined and where there are opportunities for all parties involved to be heard.

Another aspect to consider is the social and economic impact of revenge. Conflicts generated by personal vendettas can tear apart not only individual families, but entire communities, creating divisions and a climate of fear and insecurity. Legal systems, although imperfect, are designed precisely to mitigate these consequences, providing procedures and mechanisms through which people can address the wrongs suffered without sliding into violence.

In an ideal scenario, the legal system should not only punish the perpetrator, but also seek to rehabilitate him, promoting a form of restorative justice. This approach recognizes the rights of victims, but also seeks to understand the root causes of violence, aiming for a more cohesive and peaceful society. Forgiveness is never an easy choice; it requires time and a common will to rebuild what has been destroyed. For this reason, it is essential to keep the power to judge and punish within the hands of the law and institutions, and not entrust it to human instinct.

Justice must be seen not only as punishment, but as a method to restore order and dignity. It requires an element of empathy, listening and understanding. Victims’ families have the right to truth and recognition of their pain, but this right should not include the power to inflict punishment. Society has a duty to protect all its members, including those who commit crimes, by ensuring them a fair trial, where they can answer for their actions in an environment that seeks truth and justice rather than revenge.

In conclusion, taking the perpetrators out of the hands of the victims’ relatives is a crucial element in maintaining a just and equitable society. It is a necessary step to stop the perpetuation of violence and promote a context of justice that fosters healing and reconciliation. Only through a collective commitment to legality, empathy and restorative justice can we aspire to a better society, where revenge gives way to peace and understanding. True justice must never become a matter of personal vengeance, but must instead be based on strong ethical principles and a deep respect for the life and dignity of every individual.

Search site

Contact

Gerardo Fulgione Web Site